Last year was a rough one for food safety. Will 2010 be any better?

Over the holidays I wrote about a meal we all wanted to avoid.

For the appetizer: San Antonio Bay oysters polluted with Noroviruses. For the main course: grilled beef infected with E. coli from contaminated tenderizing needles; chicken with Campylobacter or imported ham with Listeria monocytogenes. Then there’s a side dish of stuffing loaded with salmonella-contaminated hazelnuts. And for those watching their weight: a popular nutritional drink fouled with the food poison Bacillus cereus.

FIGHTBACEven the family pet wasn’t forgotten.  Its pigs ears and beef hooves were laced with salmonella.

All those item were recalled in December by the federal government or were the subjects of warnings by food safety experts. And 2010 isn’t shaping up to set a safer table, according to some of the country’s leading food safety experts.

That’s not the message from the government’s three big players in the war against dangerous food — the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Agriculture and the Centers for Disease Control. All predict the food supply will be safer because of new safeguards being pushed by the Obama administration.

Less than two months after taking office, the president announced the creation of the Food Safety Working Group and promised more resources to safeguard the nation’s food supply.

“Many of the laws and regulations governing food safety in America have not been updated since they were written in the time of Teddy Roosevelt,” Obama said at that time.

“There are certain things that only a government can do. And one of those things is ensuring that the foods we eat …are safe and don’t cause us harm,” said Obama.

The USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service and the FDA are trying to improve product traceability, both forward and back, in the production chain, with the goal of being able to respond quicker to outbreaks, said Caleb Weaver, USDA’s press secretary.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack wants his agency to “further reduce the incidence of food-borne pathogens and the number of food-borne-related deaths to zero,” Weaver added.

However, some managers and field investigators in the same agencies have views much closer to those of food safety activists. They predict that the very powerful food industry lobbyists, especially for the meat producers, will go down swinging and screaming to thwart meaningful food safety reform.

If you want to see what the food safety experts are worried about, here is a link to the rest of my story on AOL News’


Last year was a rough one for food safety. Will 2010 be any better? — 2 Comments

  1. Only government can keep our food safe? Seems like they haven’t been doing such a great job, which may be why there’s such a lively, “know your farmer, know your food” movement.

    While food from a farmer you know can, of course, be contaminated, farmers who know the people who eat their products have a personal investment in making sure it’s safe. I’d be moving away in disgrace if I sickened my neighbors.

    Meanwhile, much of the food safety reform to date has only served to burden smaller producers. That suits big agribusiness just fine–less competition, more control.

  2. I am very much confident with my vegetables from my garden and some chicken in the backyard and sure they are fresh. I hope government will really be serious about food security and safety.They only become serious when many of the population becomes ill. It is often better to buy food from your neighbor’s farm, at least you know how they raise them, what they feed, if there are diseases and other things of health concern.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *